Running linux on a mac g3 mac os x#
Running linux on a mac g3 pro#
Running linux on a mac g3 code#

It is funny enough that Mitchell talked about why Adobe Acrobat files (PDF) are smaller than other types of files holding the same documents. (The demonstration given of Aqua smoothly resizing a photographic icon as a vector demonstrates that Apple has constructed some of these tools - this should be intriguing to those graphic artists that switch between Photoshop and Illustrator for their bread and butter.) Of course you'll note that they look different as well, but this is largely due to a lack of common tools. This is why Adobe Acrobat files are so much smaller than sending a bunch of scanned pages. This is why Macromedia's Flash is able to deliver relatively complex behaviors with such comparatively small download times to say, Quicktime. The same size increase to a vector simply requires that you multiply all of the variables by a common value, and the manipulation overhead does not change, for the most part. Note that when you increase the image size of a bitmap, the file size increases geometrically (assuming bit depth remains the same) as does the number of calculations required to manipulate the image. While this may seem like a more complicated method, it scales better. Vector graphics on the other hand are constructed from a mathematical description of the image, such as 'draw a red line of X thickness for Y pixels in Z direction'.

Running linux on a mac g3 code#

All of that pixel pushing you refer to is a resource hog on bitmap systems because it requires that every pixel of an image be cataloged and mapped, and that transformations require the code to perform operations upon every pixel in the image. Burt says: all of that elaborate screen drawing in OS X is being done in a completely different graphics space than has previously been seen at an OS's system level - that of vectors. And he adds: The big factor in Aqua performance (which is to say Quartz performance) will be the graphics chip, NOT the processor.

Running linux on a mac g3 pro#

The PowerBook G3 and iBook use a very similar chipset, one is a RAGE Pro and the other a RAGE Mobility. B G4's upped the chip to a RAGE 128 Pro which offers about a 50% speed boost in 3D frame rates. The AGP graphics G4's also use an improved bus that can really saturate the 128 chip to it's fullest. G4s use the RAGE 128 chipset which offers REALLY amazing 2D and quite good 3D acceleration. The Blue and White G3, slot loading iMacs and Rev A. D 'Yum' iMacs use an ATi RAGE Pro Chipset, which offers better 2D and 3D performance. A Bondi Blue iMacs are the weakest, using an ATi RAGE II based graphics chipset.

Mike McHargue says: All G3-based Macs have pretty good 2D acceleration.

They are a bit technical, but you'll want to know what they have to say:

What I'll do now is share with you some of the answers I received.

Running linux on a mac g3 mac os x#

Mac OS X Performance On A G3, Here Are The Answers!ДЄ few weeks ago, I wrote a column about Mac OS X on a G3, and raised questions about how well it would perform on the machines that dominated Apple's product line for a couple of years.ДЄs you can guess, the readers reacted and sent me a pile of e-mail, most of which was interesting. The Mac Observer Express Daily Newsletter